Explicit dynamics core: central differences, one-point hex8 with hourglass control, nodal-pressure tet4, solve.explicit (M10 X1) (#27)

* Model: explicit dynamic steps (end time, increment scale and cap, output intervals, initial velocities, rigid walls, hourglass and bulk viscosity controls); deck writers refuse them

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* fem: uniform-strain hex8 and tet4 kinematics, Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass shape vectors, element frequency bound

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Explicit solver crate (L2): central differences with lumped mass, one-point hex8 with Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass control, Bonet–Burton tet4, bulk viscosity, rigid walls, energy account; wave and impact verification

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Engine: solve.explicit and solve.history commands, explicit results in the session and solve.probe; cantilever period against the modal solver

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Docs: explicit solver in the architecture, roadmap (M10 started), parity and literature (Part H)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Simplify: Model::select_step shared by both solvers, Procedure::sets/is_dynamic, fused per-increment passes without allocation, shared element tail, generic command caps

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Catalogue: solve.explicit is ready; solve.history beside solve.probe

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* Rebase onto the implicit couplings work: Procedure is no longer Copy

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

---------

Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

crates/decks/tests/lsdyna.rs

@@ -674,3 +674,15 @@ fn hostile_numbers_stay_within_their_fields() {
     let deck = read(&w.text);
     assert_eq!(deck.nodes[&1], [1e9, -1e9, 1e-300]);
 }
+
+/// Explicit dynamic steps are not written by any deck format yet: each says so by name.
+#[test]
+fn explicit_steps_are_refused_by_every_format() {
+    let mut m = cantilever();
+    m.add_step(step("Impact", Procedure::ExplicitDynamic(ExplicitDynamic::new(1e-3)), &["clamp"], &[]), None).unwrap();
+    for f in modelcraft_decks::FORMATS {
+        let e = f.write(&m).unwrap_err();
+        assert!(matches!(e, Error::Unsupported { .. }), "{}: {e}", f.name);
+        assert!(e.to_string().contains("step `Impact`: explicit dynamic"), "{}: {e}", f.name);
+    }
+}