Element quality metrics and the certified validity gate (mesh.quality) (#12)

* mesh: element quality metrics and a certified Jacobian validity check

Bernstein-form Jacobian determinants for tet4/tet10/wedge6/hex8/hex20, certified
by bounds and subdivision (Johnen-Remacle-Geuzaine 2013); Shewchuk 2002 tet
metrics, Knupp 2001 hex/wedge/quad metrics; quality report and the validity
gate meshers run on their output.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* engine: mesh.quality command; model documents its node order

mesh.quality reports certified validity, volume and per-metric statistics with
fixed-range histograms. The model's ElementKind doc states the Abaqus/VTK node
order and that deck code reorders formats like Nastran CHEXA20.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

* quality: simplify after review; exact orient3d for tet4; gate on raw mesher arrays

- tet4 validity from the exact orient3d of the input coordinates
- validity_gate_elements takes (label, kind, coordinates) straight from a mesher
- one Jacobian per solid; certify caches piece bounds; product weights precomputed
- model::check_coordinates shared by set_node and quality; ElementKind is Ord
- engine: shared labels() parameter parser

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm

---------

Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/meshing/literature.md

@@ -746,6 +746,19 @@ Delaunay methods with Voronoi/ODT improvement, then (2) all-hex and hex-dominant
 - **HexaLab** (MIT, https://github.com/mlivesu/HexaLab, https://www.hexalab.net) is READ OK. It is a hex quality
   viewer whose metrics match the literature's.
 
+**B6.6 Element validity and quality metrics (implemented in `modelcraft-mesh::quality`).** **Verdict: BUILD ON.**
+- **Johnen, Remacle, Geuzaine 2013.** *Geometrical validity of curvilinear finite elements.* J. Comput. Phys.
+  233:359–372, 2013. The Jacobian
+  determinant in Bernstein form is bounded by its coefficients, equals them at the vertices and converges under
+  subdivision: a proof of `det J > 0` on the whole element. We use it for every solid kind, including the trilinear
+  hex whose corner Jacobians do not certify it (B6.3). (The paper's authors also wrote Gmsh code, which stays
+  forbidden; the paper is enough.)
+- **Shewchuk 2002.** *What is a good linear finite element? Interpolation, conditioning, anisotropy, and quality
+  measures.* Unpublished preprint, https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/papers/elemj.pdf. Tet dihedral angles,
+  radius ratio and aspect ratio; with Klingner–Shewchuk's volume–length measure (A3.6).
+- **Knupp 2001.** *Algebraic mesh quality metrics.* SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23(1):193–218. Corner-Jacobian scaled Jacobian and
+  shape metrics for hexes, wedges and quads.
+
 ---
 
 ## Part C: Datasets and benchmarks