Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 4329630943 mesh: the tet objective sees needles; no tet below scaled Jacobian 0.3 on the skill's tet parts
The improvement objective was the smallest dihedral sine, which misses
needles: every dihedral angle fine while a corner is nearly flat, so
the corpus meshes had scaled Jacobians down to 0.01-0.07. The objective
is now the smaller of the dihedral sine and the scaled Jacobian at the
worst corner (the measure analysts check, Knupp 2001), weighted so a
Jacobian of 0.3 (the skill's limit) counts as a 30 degree dihedral
angle (the schedule's target): the Jacobian decides only near that
limit. The existing edge removal, multi-face removal, smoothing and
insertion then remove the needles.

Skill tet10 min SJ: sphere-on-plate 0.092 -> 0.335, filleted-bracket
0.021 -> 0.318 (both pass, nothing marked). Default-size tet10:
thin-ribs 0.240, shallow-groove 0.321, rounded-box 0.311.

The strong-relaxation test relaxes below 0.45: nothing is left below
0.3. Literature note in docs/meshing/literature.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-16 22:11:53 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 426df4a333 mesh: improvement never leaves a tetrahedron floating; the gate refuses one
Deleting a cap tetrahedron (two boundary faces of one B-rep face) gives each of its
two other neighbours a boundary face; a neighbour that had three was left with every
face on the boundary, joined to the mesh by its vertices alone. On Linux the dome on
a plate (cmd::plan::decompose::tests::a_dome_on_a_plate...) got one and the static
solve found the stiffness singular. The kernel's tessellation and sphere parameters
differ in their last bits between macOS and Linux (SolidCraft, outside this repo);
given the same input the tet mesher gives the same mesh on both (checked by replaying
Linux's surface and spheres on macOS, which reproduced the floating tetrahedron).

The deletion now refuses when a neighbour would float, and the linear validity gate
fails a mesh with a tetrahedron that shares no face with the rest, saying so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-16 20:41:22 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 9c1c8f75c2 mesh: the tet mesher takes its input in a canonical order (#115)
SolidCraft lists a solid's faces in a different order from run to run
(the rounded box, for one), which reordered the triangle soup and the
face tags with every coordinate the same; welding keeps the first copy
it meets and every later stage visits ids in order, so the tet mesh
changed between runs. CanonicalSoup sorts the triangles by their
coordinates, numbers vertices by first use and face tags by first
appearance, and maps the tags back; mesh.tet.generate and the corpus
use it.

Tests: the washer's tet10 mesh has a fixed fingerprint (identical on
arm64 and x86-64 builds); a reordered, renumbered input gives the same
mesh; heavy: rounded-box and filleted-bracket mesh bit for bit the same
on repeated runs and with 1 and 8 threads.

The bracket oracle cases stay unfrozen: SolidCraft's tessellation
itself differs in the last bits between arm64 and x86-64. The coarse
case moves to 203.6 MPa with the canonical order; its band is 5%.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-16 17:43:30 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 464417d84d mesh: test that a plane is trimmed to its face (#418)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-15 21:53:38 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 111a6f1a94 Mesh: a face edge split that encroaches a feature edge splits the feature edge
Delaunay refinement split a boundary face edge at its midpoint even when that
midpoint lay inside the diametral sphere of a feature edge beside it. Each such
split halves the face vertices' distance to the curve, so they piled up against
it (the heated bracket grew face vertices 0.016 mm from a 4 mm-sized edge), the
improvement schedule could not lift the tetrahedra there to its target, and
inserted vertex after vertex around them: 29257 elements and about two minutes
to open instead of 23641 and 6 s. The SolidCraft pin move (4c91f9b) added one
interior vertex to the bracket's end faces, which changed the CDT enough to
expose it.

Following Shewchuk (1998), an encroaching midpoint now splits the encroached
feature edge instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-15 02:17:00 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 f78680e091 Mesh: the tet mesher divides a seeded edge at the seed's nodes
The seed's spacing becomes size-field samples the field grades from, and
after coarsening its nodes are put on the feature curve and pinned, so the
edge has exactly the seeded divisions at the seeded spacing. The quality
report gives, per seed, the boundary edges along it.

Part of #230.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo
2026-10-14 21:23:05 -04:00
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 9469ac0853 Tet mesh quality: one validity criterion, Delaunay refinement, ODT, Klingner–Shewchuk, tet10
The end-to-end demo met a raw-CDT sliver that the validity gate accepted (exactly positive) and
the solver refused. Now:

- One validity criterion, `fieldcraft_model::admissible_jacobian` (normalized Jacobian above
  1e-12), used by the implicit solver (fem `positive_inverse`), the explicit tet4/hex8
  kinematics and the mesh gate, which proves it on the whole element (tet4: the solvers' own
  Jacobian; curved kinds: a Bernstein floor), so whatever passes the gate passes the solvers.
- CDT rounding repaired by flips on the rounded mesh (Diazzi et al. 2023 §5.1) instead of the
  ±2-ulp nudge.
- `fieldcraft-mesh::tet`: a mutable tetrahedral complex whose every change is a checked
  replacement (positive and admissible tetrahedra, faces matched with opposite orientation) with
  an exact undo log; edge removal (Klincsek), multi-face removal, Delaunay insertion with
  boundary faces, edge collapse; a curvature- and thickness-graded size field; constrained
  Delaunay refinement with encroachment splits; ODT smoothing; the Klingner–Shewchuk schedule;
  boundary vertices moved onto the exact B-rep surfaces at the end; tet10 with mid-edge nodes on
  the geometry.
- `mesh.tet.generate` gains size, order, quality, quality_target, curvature_angle, grading,
  max_passes, max_points and reports the CDT's and the mesh's quality; `solve.probe` takes a set
  and reports its largest von Mises stress.
- Oracle cases filleted-bracket-fillet-stress(-coarse): the fillet's peak von Mises stress on
  tet10 meshes of 2k and 13.5k elements, 213.3 MPa (a four-level study stays within 1.8%); the
  CDT cases keep the raw tetrahedralization.
- Corpus quality columns: all 20 valid parts mesh and pass the gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
2026-10-14 08:28:49 -04:00