ecdff11e7206efb6eae7b06e322bf05ab1cc7d81
21
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
37f338c9e8 |
fem: mortar segmentation of face pairs with forward-mode automatic differentiation
The overlap of a secondary face with a main face (projection onto the secondary plane, Sutherland-Hodgman clipping of their triangles, Radon's seven-point rule on the overlap's fan) and the inverse linear and bilinear maps of both faces, written over a Real scalar so that f64, Dual (gradient) and Hyper (gradient and packed Hessian, 24 variables) give the values and the exact linearisation of the segmentation, the normal and the projection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9a8ae50bca |
fem: initial-stress (geometric) stiffness of solid and 2D elements
K_σ = ∫ (∇N_a · σ ∇N_b) I dV for a stress state at the stiffness points (solids, plane and axisymmetric elements with the hoop term), for linear buckling. Checked: uᵀK_σu = σ V for a uniform stress on a distorted hex20 and a plane strain quad8, rigid translations in its null space. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a30d0b5c5b |
explicit: deformable contact and friction, verified by bars, sliding blocks, the patch test and Hertz
Segment-to-segment penalty contact between element faces: each secondary face and each main face facing it are projected onto the secondary face's plane, split into triangles, clipped (Sutherland–Hodgman) and integrated with a three-point rule per sub-triangle (Puso–Laursen segmentation, the penalty at the integration points as Fischer–Wriggers), so a uniform pressure gives the consistent nodal forces on both meshes and the contact patch test passes on non-matching meshes. Every contact runs both ways at half the penalty: pairs with each surface as the secondary, general and self contact face against face. A bucket grid of face boxes every increment, faces integrated in parallel and their forces added in face order: the same numbers on any thread count. The penalty per area ε = s γ min(m/A)/Δt² comes from the lumped masses, each node's directional area and the stable increment, bounded by Gershgorin's row sums so contact never shortens the increment. Coulomb friction with exponential decay by a regularised return map at the secondary nodes; rigid walls take Coulomb impulses. Contact work and friction dissipation join the energy balance; each contact reports its peak force, first and last contact, deepest penetration, friction and the nodes adjusted at the start (initial penetrations adjusted strain-free or refused with the node, face and depth); a cap on contact faces. Verified (crates/explicit/tests/contact.rs, tests/oracle/explicit-*): colliding bars (2L/c +1.2%, ρcAv₀/2, KE kept to 0.005%, contact energy back to 8e-5 of it), blocks sliding to a stop on a rigid wall and on a plate under constant and decaying friction (0.005–0.2%), the patch test (σ_zz uniform to 0.06%), two spheres colliding against Hertz (peak +2.3%, duration −0.4%; the oracle case waits for a graded sphere mesher), a free body untouched by general contact, determinism across threads. Oracle measures gain `over` (ratios). Existing fixtures do not move. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ecf947c090 |
model: contact pairs, general contact and Coulomb friction, mapped by the deck writers
Contact definitions on face sets: a pair (each surface's nodes against the other's faces), general contact on a surface (self contact) or on every exterior face of the solids; Coulomb friction with static and kinetic coefficients and an exponential decay, a penalty scale and the choice to adjust or refuse initially penetrating nodes, validated with caps. Rigid walls of explicit steps gain friction. The check wants solid faces on contact surfaces; sets used by a contact cannot be deleted. fem::contact: the closest point of a triangle (Ericson) or a bilinear quadrilateral (projected Newton) to a point, and a bucket grid of face boxes for the global search, deterministic and bounded. Commands interaction.contact.pair, .general, .edit, .delete and .find (the touching parts of the mesh, with face sets and pairs made of them); contacts in the model browser. Abaqus writes *SURFACE INTERACTION with *FRICTION (exponential decay), *CONTACT PAIR and general *CONTACT; LS-DYNA *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE and _SINGLE_SURFACE with FS, FD, DC; Nastran refuses contact by name. The implicit solver refuses contact by name (M7); the explicit solver refuses it until the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9469ac0853 |
Tet mesh quality: one validity criterion, Delaunay refinement, ODT, Klingner–Shewchuk, tet10
The end-to-end demo met a raw-CDT sliver that the validity gate accepted (exactly positive) and the solver refused. Now: - One validity criterion, `fieldcraft_model::admissible_jacobian` (normalized Jacobian above 1e-12), used by the implicit solver (fem `positive_inverse`), the explicit tet4/hex8 kinematics and the mesh gate, which proves it on the whole element (tet4: the solvers' own Jacobian; curved kinds: a Bernstein floor), so whatever passes the gate passes the solvers. - CDT rounding repaired by flips on the rounded mesh (Diazzi et al. 2023 §5.1) instead of the ±2-ulp nudge. - `fieldcraft-mesh::tet`: a mutable tetrahedral complex whose every change is a checked replacement (positive and admissible tetrahedra, faces matched with opposite orientation) with an exact undo log; edge removal (Klincsek), multi-face removal, Delaunay insertion with boundary faces, edge collapse; a curvature- and thickness-graded size field; constrained Delaunay refinement with encroachment splits; ODT smoothing; the Klingner–Shewchuk schedule; boundary vertices moved onto the exact B-rep surfaces at the end; tet10 with mid-edge nodes on the geometry. - `mesh.tet.generate` gains size, order, quality, quality_target, curvature_angle, grading, max_passes, max_points and reports the CDT's and the mesh's quality; `solve.probe` takes a set and reports its largest von Mises stress. - Oracle cases filleted-bracket-fillet-stress(-coarse): the fillet's peak von Mises stress on tet10 meshes of 2k and 13.5k elements, 213.3 MPa (a four-level study stays within 1.8%); the CDT cases keep the raw tetrahedralization. - Corpus quality columns: all 20 valid parts mesh and pass the gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
3f9e9e30d8 |
fem, solver: thermal strain in nonlinear static steps
Temperatures now strain the material in nonlinear steps instead of being refused. At finite strain the deformation gradient splits multiplicatively, F = F_m F_theta with F_theta = diag(1 + alpha_i dT) at each point: the material sees F_m and the loops run on the thermally expanded volume J_theta dV0 (mixed elements project det F_m), so the tangent stays consistent. At small strain the split is additive, and elements on their linear stiffness take the equivalent nodal forces as a dead load. The step's temperatures are its temperature loads, or the steady conduction of its temperature conditions and heat loads (one-way coupling, as the linear coupled step); both at once are refused. They ramp with the load factor from each material's reference temperature. Johnson-Cook plasticity softens at the point's temperature. Verified: free expansion and a fully constrained neo-Hookean block at 20 % thermal stretch, full and hybrid (exact); a bar held at its ends heated past yield (exact); the linear limit and the conducted temperatures against the linear solvers; tangents by central differences with a temperature field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
53adab54c2 |
fem, model: Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh hyperelasticity in nonlinear steps
Two more large-strain options on the isotropic constants, decoupled like neo-Hookean with the volume kappa/2 (J - 1)^2: Mooney-Rivlin with C10 = mu/2 - C01 (0 <= C01 <= mu/2) and Yeoh with C10 = mu/2 and the higher terms C20, C30, so the small-strain material is the elastic one everywhere. MaterialModel::Polynomial gives the isochoric stress and tangent from Holzapfel's fictitious quantities (eqs. 6.168, 6.193), consistent by central differences, equal to neo-Hookean with C10 alone; hybrid elements take it. Abaqus writes *HYPERELASTIC, MOONEY-RIVLIN and YEOH; LS-DYNA keeps refusing hyperelastic materials in nonlinear steps by name. Verified in uniaxial and equibiaxial tension and pure shear against the compressible closed form (exact). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
72940fe78f |
fem: J2 plasticity at the implicit material point, finite and small strain
The radial return of the explicit update is now J2::radial_return, called by both solvers, with the consistent tangent J2::tangent (Simo & Hughes 1998, Box 3.2). The new elastoplastic module gives the implicit material point: Simo's multiplicative plasticity with the exponential return map in the principal logarithmic strains (CMAME 99, 1992) and its spatial tangent through the Daleckii-Krein divided differences of the logarithm, and the additive radial return of small strain with kinematic hardening. MaterialModel::Plastic carries it, decoupled (deviatoric return, Hencky volume) so hybrid elements take it. The element loops of finite.rs gain small-strain kinematics for inelastic materials and pass history through the mixed path. Every tangent is checked against central differences, element by element, from a plastic history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2321d75cc6 |
fem: finite-strain material point, total Lagrangian elements and follower pressure
The material point interface returns the Kirchhoff stress and the spatial tangent of its Lie derivative from the deformation gradient, with per-point history committed by the solver: St Venant–Kirchhoff (pushed forward from S = D E) and the decoupled compressible neo-Hookean with its isochoric and volumetric parts. Total Lagrangian solids (tet4, tet10, wedge6, hex8, hex20 full and reduced) and plane strain and axisymmetric elements give internal forces and the consistent tangent with its geometric stiffness; hybrid solids use the Simo–Taylor–Pister three-field formulation on the existing pressure fields. Incompatible modes and plane stress are refused by name. Follower pressure on faces and 2D edges with its load stiffness. Every tangent is checked against central differences of its forces. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d5bd74570f |
Rename the project to FieldCraft
Crates fieldcraft-*, binaries fieldcraft and fieldcraft-cli, the .fieldcraft file (format tag fieldcraft/1, manifest fieldcraft.json), FIELDCRAFT_* environment variables, the MCP server name, egui widget ids (fc_*), the app icon document FieldCraft.icon and its generated family, docs and licences. No compatibility shim: no files of the earlier name exist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
|
5ebb9f16dc |
Hybrid (mixed u–p) solids: hex8 and tet10 with a constant pressure, hex20 with a linear one (#49)
The isotropic elasticity splits into D_dev + K m mᵀ; an element-wise discontinuous pressure is condensed out (p̂ = K M⁻¹ Gᵀ u), leaving K_dev + K G M⁻¹ Gᵀ (Hughes §4.3–4.5). Q2–P1disc and P2–P0 are inf-sup stable; Q1–P0 does not lock; tet4 and wedge6 still lock and are refused, as are orthotropic materials (named at the section). ElementDofs counts the condensed pressures. Verified: element patch, rigid modes and totals for every hybrid kind, a block in uniaxial strain at ν = 0.4999 (exact), Lamé's cylinder in plane strain at ν = 0.4999 (hex20 1e-5, tet10 1.3e-3, hex8 2.5e-3 vs the locking displacement hex8 at −80 %). Every non-hybrid result of the test suites hashes identically before and after. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
e900f41ce3 |
FEM foundation B: heat transfer and thermal stress (solids, 2D, explicit), coupled temperature–displacement, solve.heat (#45)
* Heat transfer and thermal stress: thermal materials, temperature BCs, heat loads, heat transfer and coupled temperature–displacement steps, solve.heat
Model: Material.thermal (conductivity, specific heat, expansion, isotropic or
per axis; reference temperature), BoundaryCondition::Temperature (dof 11),
loads SurfaceFlux, Convection, HeatSource and Temperature (a field in static
steps), procedures HeatTransfer { transient (θ-method) } and
CoupledTemperatureDisplacement; checks for missing conductivity/specific
heat/expansion. fem: heat conduction kernels (conductivity, capacity,
source, face flux/film, heat flux) on the DofLayout (one T per node), thermal
strain load and stress D(ε − ε_th) for every solid formulation incl.
incompatible modes. Solver: steady and transient heat transfer, thermal loads
in static steps, coupled steps (exact one-way coupling). Engine: solve.heat,
temperature/heat-flux result fields, probes. Decks refuse heat transfer by
name. Analytic verification: slab, source+convection/flux, thick cylinder,
erfc semi-infinite solid, free/constrained expansion, bimetal strip, coupled
step.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* thermal: strains in 2D elements and explicit dynamics
Plane::thermal_load and stresses_with for plane stress (εzz free), plane
strain (σzz = −D₃·ε_th) and axisymmetric elements, incompatible modes
included; the solver's 2D kernels take them. Explicit dynamics turns a
step's temperature loads into a per-element thermal strain rate (reached
linearly over the step) subtracted from each strain increment, so it feeds
J2 and Johnson–Cook updates. Verified: free expansion in every 2D theory
and element, a biaxially held plate, an explicit free bar (ΔL = αΔT L,
stress-free) and a clamped bar at −EαΔT, capped at the yield stress with
perfect plasticity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* clippy
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* thermal: trusses take the axial thermal strain; keep the roadmap's M7 line
Truss::thermal_load and stresses_with project the thermal strain on the
member's tangent (Σ αₖ tₖ² ΔT); the static solver applies them to rod2/rod3
(#38). Explicit trusses take none yet and a warning says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
---------
Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
29ae46ff84 |
Shells and beams: MITC4/MITC3 shells, Timoshenko beams, six-DOF nodes (M4) (#47)
* fem: MITC4/MITC3 flat shells and Timoshenko beams with profile properties (ElementDofs STRUCTURAL) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: shells and beams on the DofLayout beside solids, 2D elements and trusses; analytic verification and tagged benchmarks Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * engine: probe rotations, reaction moments and shell and beam element results; docs for shells and beams Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
15a9ac9157 |
1D elements I: trusses (rod2, rod3), point masses, rotary inertia, springs and dashpots (#38)
* Model, fem and decks: point masses, rotary inertia, springs, dashpots and rod3 trusses Model: PointMass and Spring definitions (spring | dashpot; to ground or two-point; along a degree of freedom, a vector or the line of the ends) on a set or reference point, resolved per node; ElementKind::Rod3. fem: rod2/rod3 truss kernel on Basis::Line2/Line3 declaring ElementDofs (translations). Decks: Abaqus T3D3, MASS, ROTARYI, SPRING1/2/A, DASHPOT1/2/A; Nastran CONM1, CELAS2, CDAMP2; LS-DYNA ELEMENT_MASS/INERTIA and ELEMENT_DISCRETE; what a format cannot take is reported. Commands model.mass.* and model.spring.*. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Implicit solver: trusses, point masses, rotary inertia and springs on the DofLayout Trusses declare their translations like solids; point masses, inertia and springs ask the layout for the kinds they need at their nodes (translations, rotations), and reference points they use get six degrees of freedom. The matrix pattern takes rows for those points; dashpots are ignored with a warning. Existing results are bit-identical (hash-checked). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Explicit solver: trusses, point masses, springs and dashpots on the node-major layout Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: fem.md on trusses and discrete elements in the layout; regenerate features.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: trusses in plane models and corotational explicit trusses Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
50764def18 |
Explicit X2: large deformation, J2 and Johnson-Cook plasticity, damage and erosion (M10)
- model: materials gain solver-neutral plastic (bilinear isotropic/kinematic, hardening table, Johnson-Cook with adiabatic heating), damage (Johnson-Cook D1-D5) and erosion (plastic strain); explicit steps gain nonlinear_geometry (default on) and stress_rate (jaumann | green_naghdi). - fem: rotation (Hughes-Winget, Flanagan-Taylor), plasticity (radial return, capped bracketed Newton for Johnson-Cook, damage; the update takes the mechanical strain increment so thermal strains can be subtracted), closed-form hex8 gradients for deformed configurations. - explicit: updated Lagrangian hex8/tet4, per-element material state, erosion with reported energy, plastic work in the energy account. - solver: warns that the linear solver uses the elastic constants of plastic materials (results hash-identical). - decks: Abaqus *PLASTIC (+ Johnson-Cook keywords), Nastran MATS1/TABLES1, LS-DYNA *MAT_PLASTIC_KINEMATIC / *MAT_PIECEWISE_LINEAR_PLASTICITY; what a format cannot express is reported as Unsupported. - engine: model.material.plasticity, model.material.damage (catalogue ready), explicit element probe, eroded elements in the solve summary. Step commits before the rebase onto the DOF framework: branch explicit-x2-steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
|
4c0fcc80ad |
2D elements: plane stress, plane strain and axisymmetric sections on the DOF framework; mesh.planar (M4) (#39)
Model: planar section kinds with Extent, element edges in sets, edge-weighted 2D loads,
centrifugal load, 2D model checks. fem: Plane kernels on Basis::{Tri3,Tri6,Quad4,Quad8}
declaring ElementDofs::new(DofSet::PLANE); QM6 incompatible modes with the
Wilson-Ibrahimbegovic correction. Solver: Kernel enum on the DofLayout; 3D results
bit-identical (hash-checked). Decks: Abaqus CPS/CPE/CAX, Nastran membranes and RFORCE,
LS-DYNA ELFORM 12/13. Mesh: free triangle mesher, planar region meshing, face boundaries.
Engine: mesh.planar with tagged edges. Analytic verification suite in solver/tests/plane.rs.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
bd55abea7f |
FEM foundation A: DofKind/DofLayout, shape-function library with Hessians, solvers on DofLayout (#35)
* fem: DofKind/DofLayout and the shape-function library with second derivatives DofKind (Ux..Rz, T, P), DofSet, ElementDofs (per-node kinds and condensed internal unknowns) and DofLayout: mesh nodes by label, kinds in order, then reference points. basis::Basis covers line2/3, tri3/6, quad4/8/9, tet4/10, wedge6/15, pyramid5, hex8/20/27 with values, first and second natural derivatives (second-order forward AD, fem::jet) and the physical gradients, Hessians and Laplacians with the map's second-derivative term. Tested for Kronecker delta, partition of unity, polynomial completeness, finite differences, affine and curved maps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver, explicit: number degrees of freedom with DofLayout The implicit mesh numbers its unknowns with a DofLayout (mesh nodes by label with the kinds their elements declare, then six per coupled reference point); assembly adds element blocks by (node, DofKind), so a node may carry any mix of kinds; couplings, boundary conditions, loads and results address (node, kind). The explicit system keeps node-major translations, now checked against its layout (NODE_DOFS). Solid formulations declare their ElementDofs. Every static, frequency and explicit result of the solver, explicit, engine and io test suites hashes bit-identically before and after (957 results). docs/fem.md describes the DOF model and the shape-function conventions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * fem, solver: simplify after review Block offsets resolved once per node pair; add_scalar/add_diagonal take the kinds like add_block; one checked Jacobian inverse (dense::positive_inverse) for the solid kernels and the basis library; static natural-node tables; the Hessian path inverts the Jacobian once. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
0e97f8dd1d |
Results display (M4) and offscreen full-UI capture (#28)
* ui.capture: the whole window drawn offscreen and rasterised on the CPU ui.screenshot falls back to it when no frame is presented (hidden window, locked screen), so agents can look at panels and the toolbar. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Draw the open design and imported surfaces in the viewport DisplayMesh keeps node labels on every element primitive (for results), gains add_surface (geometry faces and their boundaries, coincident points welded) and displaced (elements moved by nodal offsets). Bodies are tessellated at a thousandth of their size; meshed models show the geometry as boundaries only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * results.* commands: deformed shape, contours, mode shapes, animation, reaction sums The results display is session state (ResultsView), set by commands that are not edits. Nodal fields (displacement, von Mises, principal and component stresses; principal stresses in closed form after Smith 1961) and reaction force and moment sums per set. Results kept from an earlier revision stay viewable, marked stale; solve.probe says when a result is stale. The Results tab's display and reaction entries are ready. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Results display: deformed shape, contours with legend, mode shapes and animation, probe, reaction sums The viewport draws the session's results view: elements moved by their nodes' displacements or a mode shape (automatic or given scale), faces split exactly along contour band boundaries into flat-coloured pieces (same on GPU and CPU), a legend with levels and extremes, a results panel whose controls run the results.* commands, a click probing the nearest node (solve.probe), and stale results marked. Solving from the form shows the result on the Results tab. sample::cantilever is a solvable model for tests and demos. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Simplify the results display (review) One Contour in the plot; the results scene reuses scene::build; a solve shows its result through the engine (ResultsView::for_result) and the UI raises the Results tab when a view appears; the plot's scale and contour values are kept across animation frames; design bodies are tessellated once per design; the first content is framed where the display is rebuilt; field_values in one match; probe reuses results::displacements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Results display for explicit steps: field frames, energy histories The results view works on the engine's step results (static, frequency, explicit): ResultsView.frame and results.frame {frame | time} pick an explicit field frame; the deformed shape (true scale) and contours (element stresses averaged to the nodes, velocity) follow it; animation runs through the frames. The Results panel has a frame slider and plots the kinetic, internal, hourglass and external energies with their values at the frame. sample::impact is a steel bar flying onto a rigid wall. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs/features.md after the rebase Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
d45a2da5b5 |
Explicit dynamics core: central differences, one-point hex8 with hourglass control, nodal-pressure tet4, solve.explicit (M10 X1) (#27)
* Model: explicit dynamic steps (end time, increment scale and cap, output intervals, initial velocities, rigid walls, hourglass and bulk viscosity controls); deck writers refuse them Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * fem: uniform-strain hex8 and tet4 kinematics, Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass shape vectors, element frequency bound Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Explicit solver crate (L2): central differences with lumped mass, one-point hex8 with Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass control, Bonet–Burton tet4, bulk viscosity, rigid walls, energy account; wave and impact verification Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Engine: solve.explicit and solve.history commands, explicit results in the session and solve.probe; cantilever period against the modal solver Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Docs: explicit solver in the architecture, roadmap (M10 started), parity and literature (Part H) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Simplify: Model::select_step shared by both solvers, Procedure::sets/is_dynamic, fused per-increment passes without allocation, shared element tail, generic command caps Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Catalogue: solve.explicit is ready; solve.history beside solve.probe Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Rebase onto the implicit couplings work: Procedure is no longer Copy Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
48039639cb |
Implicit solver: reference points, couplings, moments, wedge6 (M4) (#26)
* fem: wedge6 element (triangle × interval, 3 × 2 points), patch and cantilever tests Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: reference points, kinematic and distributing couplings, moments by constraint elimination Coupled reference points get six degrees of freedom; kinematic couplings are rigid links, distributing couplings least-squares interpolation constraints. Every constraint row and prescribed value is eliminated master-slave (Abel-Shephard pivot choice), so the reduced matrix stays SPD; no coupling gives the old elimination bit for bit. Verified: rigid motion of a coupled block, clamping through a point, distributing tension vs pressure, bending and tube torsion. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * engine: reference point results in solve.static and solve.probe Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: couplings, moments and wedge6 in the solver docs, literature and roadmap Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: simplify constraint elimination and reference point plumbing Rows combine by one sort; T_f transposed once; K and M reduced in one pass on a shared pattern; prescribed motion computed once; reference point loads and BCs go through Resolved like node ones (Mesh::label_dofs); one dof-direction rule; StepResult::locate for probes; dead Csr::restrict removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: refuse oversized reductions before allocating them A held distributing coupling point makes a dense (3N)^2 block; estimate it from the constraint rows and refuse it against the factorization's memory budget with a clear message, before anything is built. Other reductions with dependents count their entries first (stopping at the budget) and reserve fallibly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
40f98f0af9 |
Implicit solver: fem kernels (tet4/10, hex8, hex20), sparse Cholesky, block Lanczos, solve.* commands (M4) (#23)
* Renumber the layer table for solver crates: fem at L1, solver at L2, fsi at L3 L0 model -> L1 geometry, mesh, fem, decks, render -> L2 solver (explicit, lbm later) -> L3 fsi (later) -> L4 doc -> L5 io -> L6 engine -> L7 ui-egui, mcp -> apps. UI_MIN_LAYER moves to 7, the testkit sits above it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * modelcraft-fem: element kernels for tet4, tet10, hex8 (full, incompatible modes), hex20 (full, reduced) Shape functions, Gauss and conical-product quadrature, stiffness, consistent and HRZ-lumped mass, body forces, consistent pressure loads on faces, integration-point stresses and their least-squares extrapolation to nodes, isotropic and orthotropic elasticity. The element table is one row per kind, so wedges, shells and beams are added locally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * modelcraft-solver: linear static and frequency analysis with an analytic verification suite Assembly from the resolved model on the node graph, boundary conditions by elimination, consistent pressure, gravity and body-force loads, nested-dissection ordering, sparse up-looking Cholesky with a factor-size cap, reactions, integration-point and nodal-averaged stresses, von Mises; shift-invert block Lanczos with full reorthogonalization for natural modes, participation and effective mass. ADR 0001 records the own-linear-algebra decision (determinism, wasm). Verified against closed forms: displacement and traction patch tests for every element, cantilever tip deflection (Timoshenko) with convergence rates, Lamé cylinder, Kirsch hole (Kt -> 3), cantilever and free-free beam frequencies with six rigid-body modes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Engine: solve.static, solve.frequency and solve.probe; results kept in the session Results are stored per step, restored on a failed command and cleared when the model changes. Caps (degrees of freedom, factor entries, Lanczos vectors) may only be lowered; hostile parameters are tested against a solvable session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: implicit solver architecture, roadmap M4, parity and references Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Simplify the solver: shared face integration, block assembly, cached extrapolation - model: one face integrator (nodal::face_normal_weights) for tractions and pressures - fem: mid-side tables from ElementKind::edges, orthotropic via inverse3, symmetric accumulation without a symmetrize pass, incompatible-mode recovery without K_uu, model's coordinate check, dead table rows removed - solver: one pattern search per node pair (block, scalar and diagonal adds), extrapolation built once per element type, reactions from the prescribed rows only, matrices dropped after restriction, the free-body shift keyed on the factorization error, step selection in the solver, Error::Element naming the element - engine: the solver owns the default step and the shift check; the model comparison runs once Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: results are stamped with the session revision Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |