fe7d53671973e5ac3bd49c244d9d6a73fd1d22d2
18
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9469ac0853 |
Tet mesh quality: one validity criterion, Delaunay refinement, ODT, Klingner–Shewchuk, tet10
The end-to-end demo met a raw-CDT sliver that the validity gate accepted (exactly positive) and the solver refused. Now: - One validity criterion, `fieldcraft_model::admissible_jacobian` (normalized Jacobian above 1e-12), used by the implicit solver (fem `positive_inverse`), the explicit tet4/hex8 kinematics and the mesh gate, which proves it on the whole element (tet4: the solvers' own Jacobian; curved kinds: a Bernstein floor), so whatever passes the gate passes the solvers. - CDT rounding repaired by flips on the rounded mesh (Diazzi et al. 2023 §5.1) instead of the ±2-ulp nudge. - `fieldcraft-mesh::tet`: a mutable tetrahedral complex whose every change is a checked replacement (positive and admissible tetrahedra, faces matched with opposite orientation) with an exact undo log; edge removal (Klincsek), multi-face removal, Delaunay insertion with boundary faces, edge collapse; a curvature- and thickness-graded size field; constrained Delaunay refinement with encroachment splits; ODT smoothing; the Klingner–Shewchuk schedule; boundary vertices moved onto the exact B-rep surfaces at the end; tet10 with mid-edge nodes on the geometry. - `mesh.tet.generate` gains size, order, quality, quality_target, curvature_angle, grading, max_passes, max_points and reports the CDT's and the mesh's quality; `solve.probe` takes a set and reports its largest von Mises stress. - Oracle cases filleted-bracket-fillet-stress(-coarse): the fillet's peak von Mises stress on tet10 meshes of 2k and 13.5k elements, 213.3 MPa (a four-level study stays within 1.8%); the CDT cases keep the raw tetrahedralization. - Corpus quality columns: all 20 valid parts mesh and pass the gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
3f9e9e30d8 |
fem, solver: thermal strain in nonlinear static steps
Temperatures now strain the material in nonlinear steps instead of being refused. At finite strain the deformation gradient splits multiplicatively, F = F_m F_theta with F_theta = diag(1 + alpha_i dT) at each point: the material sees F_m and the loops run on the thermally expanded volume J_theta dV0 (mixed elements project det F_m), so the tangent stays consistent. At small strain the split is additive, and elements on their linear stiffness take the equivalent nodal forces as a dead load. The step's temperatures are its temperature loads, or the steady conduction of its temperature conditions and heat loads (one-way coupling, as the linear coupled step); both at once are refused. They ramp with the load factor from each material's reference temperature. Johnson-Cook plasticity softens at the point's temperature. Verified: free expansion and a fully constrained neo-Hookean block at 20 % thermal stretch, full and hybrid (exact); a bar held at its ends heated past yield (exact); the linear limit and the conducted temperatures against the linear solvers; tangents by central differences with a temperature field. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
53adab54c2 |
fem, model: Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh hyperelasticity in nonlinear steps
Two more large-strain options on the isotropic constants, decoupled like neo-Hookean with the volume kappa/2 (J - 1)^2: Mooney-Rivlin with C10 = mu/2 - C01 (0 <= C01 <= mu/2) and Yeoh with C10 = mu/2 and the higher terms C20, C30, so the small-strain material is the elastic one everywhere. MaterialModel::Polynomial gives the isochoric stress and tangent from Holzapfel's fictitious quantities (eqs. 6.168, 6.193), consistent by central differences, equal to neo-Hookean with C10 alone; hybrid elements take it. Abaqus writes *HYPERELASTIC, MOONEY-RIVLIN and YEOH; LS-DYNA keeps refusing hyperelastic materials in nonlinear steps by name. Verified in uniaxial and equibiaxial tension and pure shear against the compressible closed form (exact). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
17b2c837f2 |
solver: J2 plasticity in nonlinear static steps, finite and small strain
Elements of a plastic material take the J2 material point: total Lagrangian with nonlinear geometry, the small-strain loops without (elastic elements keep their linear stiffness, so elastic results do not move). The plastic history is committed per converged increment. Increments follow the step's load path, ending at its points, the extrapolated predictor scaled by the change of the load factor. Steps with path-dependent materials start an increment without a predictor from the tangent predictor (the prescribed motion spread through the converged tangent), and a first tangent that is not positive definite is a cutback when the undeformed model's is. Refused by name: the Johnson-Cook rate term (a static step has no time) and kinematic hardening at finite strain; damage, erosion and adiabatic heating are left out with a warning. Results carry the equivalent plastic strain at the integration points (solve.probe, the step summary). LS-DYNA writes a load path as the step's curve; Abaqus refuses it and a plastic deck of several general steps (Abaqus carries the plastic state between them). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
72940fe78f |
fem: J2 plasticity at the implicit material point, finite and small strain
The radial return of the explicit update is now J2::radial_return, called by both solvers, with the consistent tangent J2::tangent (Simo & Hughes 1998, Box 3.2). The new elastoplastic module gives the implicit material point: Simo's multiplicative plasticity with the exponential return map in the principal logarithmic strains (CMAME 99, 1992) and its spatial tangent through the Daleckii-Krein divided differences of the logarithm, and the additive radial return of small strain with kinematic hardening. MaterialModel::Plastic carries it, decoupled (deviatoric return, Hencky volume) so hybrid elements take it. The element loops of finite.rs gain small-strain kinematics for inelastic materials and pass history through the mixed path. Every tangent is checked against central differences, element by element, from a plastic history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2183fdbe81 |
solver: nonlinear static analysis by Newton–Raphson with automatic increments
solve.nonlinear follows a nonlinear static step in load increments: dead loads and prescribed displacements ramp with the load factor, a pressure follows the deformed faces (its load stiffness symmetrised so the supernodal Cholesky stays), the consistent tangent is refactored every iteration with an optional line search, and an increment converges on force, displacement and energy together. Increments start from the extrapolated last one, grow after fast convergence and are cut back on inversion, a non-finite or growing residual, an indefinite tangent or too many iterations; the step stops cleanly at the minimum increment, the increment cap or the Newton iteration limit. Elements are assembled in parallel in label order (same bits on any thread count). Results carry Cauchy stress, logarithmic strain, the increment history and a displacement frame per increment, which results.frame and the results panel show. Trusses, shells, beams, plane stress, incompatible modes, temperature and centrifugal loads are refused by name; couplings warn that they stay linear. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d5bd74570f |
Rename the project to FieldCraft
Crates fieldcraft-*, binaries fieldcraft and fieldcraft-cli, the .fieldcraft file (format tag fieldcraft/1, manifest fieldcraft.json), FIELDCRAFT_* environment variables, the MCP server name, egui widget ids (fc_*), the app icon document FieldCraft.icon and its generated family, docs and licences. No compatibility shim: no files of the earlier name exist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
|
5ebb9f16dc |
Hybrid (mixed u–p) solids: hex8 and tet10 with a constant pressure, hex20 with a linear one (#49)
The isotropic elasticity splits into D_dev + K m mᵀ; an element-wise discontinuous pressure is condensed out (p̂ = K M⁻¹ Gᵀ u), leaving K_dev + K G M⁻¹ Gᵀ (Hughes §4.3–4.5). Q2–P1disc and P2–P0 are inf-sup stable; Q1–P0 does not lock; tet4 and wedge6 still lock and are refused, as are orthotropic materials (named at the section). ElementDofs counts the condensed pressures. Verified: element patch, rigid modes and totals for every hybrid kind, a block in uniaxial strain at ν = 0.4999 (exact), Lamé's cylinder in plane strain at ν = 0.4999 (hex20 1e-5, tet10 1.3e-3, hex8 2.5e-3 vs the locking displacement hex8 at −80 %). Every non-hybrid result of the test suites hashes identically before and after. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
e900f41ce3 |
FEM foundation B: heat transfer and thermal stress (solids, 2D, explicit), coupled temperature–displacement, solve.heat (#45)
* Heat transfer and thermal stress: thermal materials, temperature BCs, heat loads, heat transfer and coupled temperature–displacement steps, solve.heat
Model: Material.thermal (conductivity, specific heat, expansion, isotropic or
per axis; reference temperature), BoundaryCondition::Temperature (dof 11),
loads SurfaceFlux, Convection, HeatSource and Temperature (a field in static
steps), procedures HeatTransfer { transient (θ-method) } and
CoupledTemperatureDisplacement; checks for missing conductivity/specific
heat/expansion. fem: heat conduction kernels (conductivity, capacity,
source, face flux/film, heat flux) on the DofLayout (one T per node), thermal
strain load and stress D(ε − ε_th) for every solid formulation incl.
incompatible modes. Solver: steady and transient heat transfer, thermal loads
in static steps, coupled steps (exact one-way coupling). Engine: solve.heat,
temperature/heat-flux result fields, probes. Decks refuse heat transfer by
name. Analytic verification: slab, source+convection/flux, thick cylinder,
erfc semi-infinite solid, free/constrained expansion, bimetal strip, coupled
step.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* thermal: strains in 2D elements and explicit dynamics
Plane::thermal_load and stresses_with for plane stress (εzz free), plane
strain (σzz = −D₃·ε_th) and axisymmetric elements, incompatible modes
included; the solver's 2D kernels take them. Explicit dynamics turns a
step's temperature loads into a per-element thermal strain rate (reached
linearly over the step) subtracted from each strain increment, so it feeds
J2 and Johnson–Cook updates. Verified: free expansion in every 2D theory
and element, a biaxially held plate, an explicit free bar (ΔL = αΔT L,
stress-free) and a clamped bar at −EαΔT, capped at the yield stress with
perfect plasticity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* clippy
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
* thermal: trusses take the axial thermal strain; keep the roadmap's M7 line
Truss::thermal_load and stresses_with project the thermal strain on the
member's tangent (Σ αₖ tₖ² ΔT); the static solver applies them to rod2/rod3
(#38). Explicit trusses take none yet and a warning says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
---------
Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
29ae46ff84 |
Shells and beams: MITC4/MITC3 shells, Timoshenko beams, six-DOF nodes (M4) (#47)
* fem: MITC4/MITC3 flat shells and Timoshenko beams with profile properties (ElementDofs STRUCTURAL) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: shells and beams on the DofLayout beside solids, 2D elements and trusses; analytic verification and tagged benchmarks Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * engine: probe rotations, reaction moments and shell and beam element results; docs for shells and beams Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
15a9ac9157 |
1D elements I: trusses (rod2, rod3), point masses, rotary inertia, springs and dashpots (#38)
* Model, fem and decks: point masses, rotary inertia, springs, dashpots and rod3 trusses Model: PointMass and Spring definitions (spring | dashpot; to ground or two-point; along a degree of freedom, a vector or the line of the ends) on a set or reference point, resolved per node; ElementKind::Rod3. fem: rod2/rod3 truss kernel on Basis::Line2/Line3 declaring ElementDofs (translations). Decks: Abaqus T3D3, MASS, ROTARYI, SPRING1/2/A, DASHPOT1/2/A; Nastran CONM1, CELAS2, CDAMP2; LS-DYNA ELEMENT_MASS/INERTIA and ELEMENT_DISCRETE; what a format cannot take is reported. Commands model.mass.* and model.spring.*. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Implicit solver: trusses, point masses, rotary inertia and springs on the DofLayout Trusses declare their translations like solids; point masses, inertia and springs ask the layout for the kinds they need at their nodes (translations, rotations), and reference points they use get six degrees of freedom. The matrix pattern takes rows for those points; dashpots are ignored with a warning. Existing results are bit-identical (hash-checked). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Explicit solver: trusses, point masses, springs and dashpots on the node-major layout Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: fem.md on trusses and discrete elements in the layout; regenerate features.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: trusses in plane models and corotational explicit trusses Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
5e5a2ae251 |
Fast PR CI: small hostile-test caps, heavy tests in a separate job (#43)
* test: hostile-params test runs under small session work caps Session gains Limits, the defaults of mesh.tet.generate's max_steiner and max_tets (production values unchanged; a parameter still overrides them; file.open keeps them). The registry-wide hostile-params test runs on sessions with small caps, so the needle-triangle tessellation it meshes is refused at once instead of meshing to the 50k Steiner cap: the engine test binary drops from ~350 s to ~20 s locally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * ci: move heavy tests to a heavy job on main, nightly and on demand Four slow tests are #[ignore = "heavy: ..."] (every corpus recipe, the cantilever convergence study, the explicit-vs-modal cantilever period, the generic-predicate rational cross-check); fast representative tests of each area stay in the PR gate. cargo xtask test --heavy runs every ignored test (benchmarks included) and the doc tests; cargo xtask test and ci run the rest without the doc tests. The new heavy CI job runs it on pushes to main, nightly and on workflow_dispatch. Branch jobs restore main's rust cache and no longer save their own. AGENTS.md documents the rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * test: the three slow LBM verification cases run in the heavy job The Stokes-drag sphere array, the staircase-pipe convergence study and the developing-channel case are heavy (21 s, 11 s, 6 s alone); plane Poiseuille, Couette, Taylor-Green, reproducibility and the stability limits stay in the PR gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5
|
50764def18 |
Explicit X2: large deformation, J2 and Johnson-Cook plasticity, damage and erosion (M10)
- model: materials gain solver-neutral plastic (bilinear isotropic/kinematic, hardening table, Johnson-Cook with adiabatic heating), damage (Johnson-Cook D1-D5) and erosion (plastic strain); explicit steps gain nonlinear_geometry (default on) and stress_rate (jaumann | green_naghdi). - fem: rotation (Hughes-Winget, Flanagan-Taylor), plasticity (radial return, capped bracketed Newton for Johnson-Cook, damage; the update takes the mechanical strain increment so thermal strains can be subtracted), closed-form hex8 gradients for deformed configurations. - explicit: updated Lagrangian hex8/tet4, per-element material state, erosion with reported energy, plastic work in the energy account. - solver: warns that the linear solver uses the elastic constants of plastic materials (results hash-identical). - decks: Abaqus *PLASTIC (+ Johnson-Cook keywords), Nastran MATS1/TABLES1, LS-DYNA *MAT_PLASTIC_KINEMATIC / *MAT_PIECEWISE_LINEAR_PLASTICITY; what a format cannot express is reported as Unsupported. - engine: model.material.plasticity, model.material.damage (catalogue ready), explicit element probe, eroded elements in the solve summary. Step commits before the rebase onto the DOF framework: branch explicit-x2-steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm |
||
|
|
4c0fcc80ad |
2D elements: plane stress, plane strain and axisymmetric sections on the DOF framework; mesh.planar (M4) (#39)
Model: planar section kinds with Extent, element edges in sets, edge-weighted 2D loads,
centrifugal load, 2D model checks. fem: Plane kernels on Basis::{Tri3,Tri6,Quad4,Quad8}
declaring ElementDofs::new(DofSet::PLANE); QM6 incompatible modes with the
Wilson-Ibrahimbegovic correction. Solver: Kernel enum on the DofLayout; 3D results
bit-identical (hash-checked). Decks: Abaqus CPS/CPE/CAX, Nastran membranes and RFORCE,
LS-DYNA ELFORM 12/13. Mesh: free triangle mesher, planar region meshing, face boundaries.
Engine: mesh.planar with tagged edges. Analytic verification suite in solver/tests/plane.rs.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm
Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
a17752a49f |
Lattice Boltzmann flow on the CPU: model, solver, engine (M12) (#36)
Model: Newtonian fluid materials; fluid domains (box, spacing, conditions on the box faces, obstacle bodies with conditions on their named faces, initial velocity, body acceleration); fluid steps with caps. Deck writers refuse fluid steps; a fluid-only model needs no mesh in model.check; one step selector (Model::select_step) for every solver. New L2 crate modelcraft-lbm: D3Q19 two-relaxation-time collision with Guo forcing; halfway bounce-back walls (moving walls after Ladd), slip faces, periodic pairs; Zou–He velocity and pressure faces with the D3Q19 transverse correction; obstacles voxelised from the face-tagged boundary surface with exact predicates and symbolic perturbation; momentum-exchange forces per box face and per B-rep face; unit conversion, automatic time step and Mach/tau limits; bounded runs with frames and force histories. Engine: model.fluid_domain.create/edit/delete, model.fluid_domain.boundary, solve.fluid (obstacles from the open design or imported surfaces, lowerable caps), solve.probe for fluid fields and wall force histories. Fluid Domain, Inlet & Outlet and Lattice Boltzmann toolbar entries are ready. Verification (analytic): plane Poiseuille exact with Λ = 3/16 and second order (2.000) with Λ = 1/4; Couette exact with the wall shear; Taylor–Green decay second order (2.01, 2.00); staircase pipe; Stokes drag of a sphere array within 1.7% of Hasimoto at R = 6; Zou–He channel; mass conserved to round-off; bit-for-bit reproducibility. Benchmark: Schäfer–Turek 2D-1. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
d45a2da5b5 |
Explicit dynamics core: central differences, one-point hex8 with hourglass control, nodal-pressure tet4, solve.explicit (M10 X1) (#27)
* Model: explicit dynamic steps (end time, increment scale and cap, output intervals, initial velocities, rigid walls, hourglass and bulk viscosity controls); deck writers refuse them Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * fem: uniform-strain hex8 and tet4 kinematics, Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass shape vectors, element frequency bound Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Explicit solver crate (L2): central differences with lumped mass, one-point hex8 with Flanagan–Belytschko hourglass control, Bonet–Burton tet4, bulk viscosity, rigid walls, energy account; wave and impact verification Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Engine: solve.explicit and solve.history commands, explicit results in the session and solve.probe; cantilever period against the modal solver Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Docs: explicit solver in the architecture, roadmap (M10 started), parity and literature (Part H) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Simplify: Model::select_step shared by both solvers, Procedure::sets/is_dynamic, fused per-increment passes without allocation, shared element tail, generic command caps Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Catalogue: solve.explicit is ready; solve.history beside solve.probe Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Rebase onto the implicit couplings work: Procedure is no longer Copy Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
48039639cb |
Implicit solver: reference points, couplings, moments, wedge6 (M4) (#26)
* fem: wedge6 element (triangle × interval, 3 × 2 points), patch and cantilever tests Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: reference points, kinematic and distributing couplings, moments by constraint elimination Coupled reference points get six degrees of freedom; kinematic couplings are rigid links, distributing couplings least-squares interpolation constraints. Every constraint row and prescribed value is eliminated master-slave (Abel-Shephard pivot choice), so the reduced matrix stays SPD; no coupling gives the old elimination bit for bit. Verified: rigid motion of a coupled block, clamping through a point, distributing tension vs pressure, bending and tube torsion. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * engine: reference point results in solve.static and solve.probe Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: couplings, moments and wedge6 in the solver docs, literature and roadmap Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: simplify constraint elimination and reference point plumbing Rows combine by one sort; T_f transposed once; K and M reduced in one pass on a shared pattern; prescribed motion computed once; reference point loads and BCs go through Resolved like node ones (Mesh::label_dofs); one dof-direction rule; StepResult::locate for probes; dead Csr::restrict removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * solver: refuse oversized reductions before allocating them A held distributing coupling point makes a dense (3N)^2 block; estimate it from the constraint rows and refuse it against the factorization's memory budget with a clear message, before anything is built. Other reductions with dependents count their entries first (stopping at the budget) and reserve fallibly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
40f98f0af9 |
Implicit solver: fem kernels (tet4/10, hex8, hex20), sparse Cholesky, block Lanczos, solve.* commands (M4) (#23)
* Renumber the layer table for solver crates: fem at L1, solver at L2, fsi at L3 L0 model -> L1 geometry, mesh, fem, decks, render -> L2 solver (explicit, lbm later) -> L3 fsi (later) -> L4 doc -> L5 io -> L6 engine -> L7 ui-egui, mcp -> apps. UI_MIN_LAYER moves to 7, the testkit sits above it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * modelcraft-fem: element kernels for tet4, tet10, hex8 (full, incompatible modes), hex20 (full, reduced) Shape functions, Gauss and conical-product quadrature, stiffness, consistent and HRZ-lumped mass, body forces, consistent pressure loads on faces, integration-point stresses and their least-squares extrapolation to nodes, isotropic and orthotropic elasticity. The element table is one row per kind, so wedges, shells and beams are added locally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * modelcraft-solver: linear static and frequency analysis with an analytic verification suite Assembly from the resolved model on the node graph, boundary conditions by elimination, consistent pressure, gravity and body-force loads, nested-dissection ordering, sparse up-looking Cholesky with a factor-size cap, reactions, integration-point and nodal-averaged stresses, von Mises; shift-invert block Lanczos with full reorthogonalization for natural modes, participation and effective mass. ADR 0001 records the own-linear-algebra decision (determinism, wasm). Verified against closed forms: displacement and traction patch tests for every element, cantilever tip deflection (Timoshenko) with convergence rates, Lamé cylinder, Kirsch hole (Kt -> 3), cantilever and free-free beam frequencies with six rigid-body modes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Engine: solve.static, solve.frequency and solve.probe; results kept in the session Results are stored per step, restored on a failed command and cleared when the model changes. Caps (degrees of freedom, factor entries, Lanczos vectors) may only be lowered; hostile parameters are tested against a solvable session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: implicit solver architecture, roadmap M4, parity and references Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * Simplify the solver: shared face integration, block assembly, cached extrapolation - model: one face integrator (nodal::face_normal_weights) for tractions and pressures - fem: mid-side tables from ElementKind::edges, orthotropic via inverse3, symmetric accumulation without a symmetrize pass, incompatible-mode recovery without K_uu, model's coordinate check, dead table rows removed - solver: one pattern search per node pair (block, scalar and diagonal adds), extrapolation built once per element type, reactions from the prescribed rows only, matrices dropped after restriction, the free-body shift keyed on the factorization error, step selection in the solver, Error::Element naming the element - engine: the solver owns the default step and the shift check; the model comparison runs once Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm * docs: results are stamped with the session revision Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NmAttHhUZTokgPeEJia8sm --------- Co-authored-by: jyviko <2501648+jyviko@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |