jyvikoandClaude Opus 5.5 417c0c8897 mesh: the tet objective sees needles; no tet below scaled Jacobian 0.3 on the skill's tet parts ...

The improvement objective was the smallest dihedral sine, which misses
needles: every dihedral angle fine while a corner is nearly flat, so
the corpus meshes had scaled Jacobians down to 0.01-0.07. The objective
is now the smaller of the dihedral sine and the scaled Jacobian at the
worst corner (the measure analysts check, Knupp 2001), weighted so a
Jacobian of 0.3 (the skill's limit) counts as a 30 degree dihedral
angle (the schedule's target): the Jacobian decides only near that
limit. The existing edge removal, multi-face removal, smoothing and
insertion then remove the needles.

Skill tet10 min SJ: sphere-on-plate 0.092 -> 0.335, filleted-bracket
0.021 -> 0.318 (both pass, nothing marked). Default-size tet10:
thin-ribs 0.240, shallow-groove 0.321, rounded-box 0.311.

The strong-relaxation test relaxes below 0.45: nothing is left below
0.3. Literature note in docs/meshing/literature.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UhhZMBTviDQxZvwnyP89fo

2026-10-17 00:51:20 -04:00

..

src

mesh: the tet objective sees needles; no tet below scaled Jacobian 0.3 on the skill's tet parts

2026-10-17 00:51:20 -04:00

tests

Rename the project to FieldCraft

2026-10-13 23:51:40 -04:00

Cargo.toml

mesh: platform-independent maths (libm) so meshes are bit-identical on macOS and Linux

2026-10-16 18:30:00 -04:00